Jump to content


Photo

Scanning 35Mm Negatives To Digital

negatives scanning V600

  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 JohnP

JohnP

    New Member

  • Stunners
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
  • Lenses:Nikon 16 mm f/2.8 D Fisheye
    Nikon 18-200mm AF-S DX f/3.5-5.6 VR
    Nikon 20mm f/4 Ais
    Nikon 24-120mm f/4
    Nikon 35mm AF-S DX f/1.8 G
    Nikon 50mm f/1.4
    Voigtlander 58mm f1.4 Nokton SL II
    Nikon 60mm AF Micro f/2.8 D
    Nikon 105 f/3.5 Ais
    Nikon 135mm DC AF f/2 D
    Nikon 80-400mm AF ED f/4.5-5.6 VR
  • Flashes:Nikon SB 700
    Nikon SB 800
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Nikon D700
    Nikon D7100
    Nikon F100

Posted 10 September 2015 - 11:39 PM

I have a personal collection of a few thousand 35mm negatives that I would like to convert to digital. At some point it would be nice to have the collections imported to Lightroom, post processed and digitally archived.

 

My initial scans using the Epson V600 produced OK results but there was noticeable softness and lack of crisp detail compared to original photographs from the negatives. I tried scanning with and without Digital ICE.

 

I don't know much about wet mount scanning and I was hoping that you could provide some advice, Will wet mounting harm the negatives? Will the scans be crisper? Is there a better method?

 

Finally,  could you please recommend a reliable and affordable service for outsourcing this task?

 

Thank you,

 

John



#2 RAH1861

RAH1861

    <3 SDP

  • Stunners
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 576 posts
  • LocationHampton, NH
  • Lenses:Sigma 17-50mm f2.8; Canon 60mm macro; Canon 400mm f5.6L; Canon 10-18mm; Canon 24mm pancake; Canon 55-250; Tamron 70-300; Sigma 18-250; Samyang Fisheye; Samyang 16mm; Samyang 35mm; Tokina 12-24mm
  • Flashes:YongNuo YN-468 II
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Canon 80D; Canon 60D; Canon SL1; Olympus E-M10; Panasonic GM5; Panasonic Lumix LX5

Posted 11 September 2015 - 09:22 AM

I may be incorrect, but I think that wet mount scanning is used for flat negatives - i.e. that are not contained in cardboard holders like a slide is. In order to use wet mount scanning, you have to encase the transparency tightly between two sheets, enveloped by the fluid. I guess you could remove each slide from the cardboard, but that would be quite a chore. I suppose you could do several slides at once, but it still sounds like a lot of work to me. Maybe just use it for a few favorites?

 

I think for a large volume like you have, it is best to send them to a service. Sorry, I have no recommedations myself, but I wish you luck! :)

 

Edit: Oops! I just reread your post and see that you did not say "slides." Sorry, my mistake. OK, so you have negatives. Um, still a tremendous amount of work. You need special holders for wet mount scanning (you can buy kits for about $100), because the negative has to be raised a certain amount to get the scanner's focus to be correct. A real job. I read about it awhile ago (to scan some medium format negatives) and decided it wasn't something I wanted to do. I wound up photographing the negatives with a DSLR on a light table (not that I am suggesting that to you - scanning is definitely the way to go for those small 35mm negatives).


Rich





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users