Jump to content


Photo

Which Zoom For Olympus Em-10


8 replies to this topic

#1 Plink

Plink

    Member

  • Stunners
  • PipPip
  • 15 posts
  • LocationUK
  • Lenses:Nikon 50mm 1.8D
    Sigma 24-105 f4
  • Flashes:Yongnuo YN568EX TTL
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Nikon D810

Posted 03 April 2015 - 01:31 PM

I own an Olympus E-M10 which I like very much. I currently have a couple of prime lenses which I am happy with.

 

1. Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8

   

2. Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH (H-H020)

 

I also have the olympus 9mm 1:8.0 fisheye just for a bit of fun.

 

I'm now looking to add a telephoto or stronger magnification lens for 'distance' shots.

 

Does anyone have any recommendations of a good quality lens or two to add to my collection?

 

Many thanks for any advice.



#2 Billy

Billy

    Super Geek

  • Stunners
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 205 posts
  • LocationRaleigh, NC
  • Lenses:Sigma 19mm/2.8, Sigma 30mm/2.8, Panasonic 45-175mm, Rokinon 7.5mm fisheye
  • Flashes:Yongnuo YN560-III
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Panasonic G3, Olympus E-M10

Posted 03 April 2015 - 01:41 PM

What's your budget and application?  I guess it's easy to recommend the 40-150/2.8 Pro, but only if you have $1,500 to drop.  I have the Panasonic 45-175mm/f4-5.6 which I like a lot, but I bought it when I owned a Panasonic G3 and needed the OIS.  Now I, too, own an E-M10 and while the lens works great, I'd probably look at the Oly lenses without OIS.

 

The 40-150/f4-5.6 is incredibly inexpensive ($120) and looks like a good lens on a budget that could do some outdoor portraiture.  I'd be tempted to go with the 70-300/f4-5.6 which is more expensive ($400), but would still work for outdoor portraiture but also be pretty nifty for wildlife and moon shots since it's EFL is 600mm.  Hmm, maybe I'll ebay my 45-175mm and see if I can get a 70-300 for even money.


  • Aushiker likes this

#3 Aushiker

Aushiker

    I come bearing news!

  • Stunners
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 111 posts
  • LocationFremantle, Western Australia
  • Lenses:Minolta MD Rokkor 45mm f/2.0
    Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm f/1.8
    Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-150mm f/4.0-5.6
    Panasonic Lumix G Vario 100-300 mm f/4.0-5.6
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Olympus OM-D EM-1
    Panasonic Lumix LX100
    Panasonic DMC-FT-4

Posted 03 April 2015 - 11:27 PM

I am with Billy here.  I do have the Olympus 40-150mm f/4-5.6 and it is okay but not brillant by any means.  I do find its EFL limiting so I am watching eBay for a 70-300.  A 40-150/2.8 Pro is on my list when and ever the second hand prices come down a bit.

 

Andrew


C&C always welcome
Equipment: Olympus OM-D EM-1 | Panasonic Lumix LX100 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-150mm f/4.0-5.6 I | Olympus 17mm f/1.8 | Panasonic Lumix G Vario 100-300 mm f/4.0-5.6 | Minolta MD Rokkor 45mm f/2.0 |

#4 Plink

Plink

    Member

  • Stunners
  • PipPip
  • 15 posts
  • LocationUK
  • Lenses:Nikon 50mm 1.8D
    Sigma 24-105 f4
  • Flashes:Yongnuo YN568EX TTL
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Nikon D810

Posted 04 April 2015 - 04:42 AM

Hi, thanks for the replies.

 

I have looked at the 40-150/2.8 Pro which together with the 1.4 tele converter looks a great option, if a little large and expensive. My em10 is my only camera, and i'm still torn about which way my photographic hobby will go. I'm going to be travelling a great deal in a camper van, and need the reach of a larger tele lens, but the Pro lens is a big investment and ties me in to the micro 4/3s system in the longer term. I'm still undecided if I should keep the em10 system 'small' for 'walking around' shots and instead invest in a dslr for landscape/wildlife photography. I'm not sure if any extra quality of dslr will be that significant or not. It seems a confusing time in photography at the moment with the different systems, and especially for an inexperienced photographer such as myself who doesnt want to feel held back by gear,  but also wants really high quality at a reasonable cost.



#5 Plink

Plink

    Member

  • Stunners
  • PipPip
  • 15 posts
  • LocationUK
  • Lenses:Nikon 50mm 1.8D
    Sigma 24-105 f4
  • Flashes:Yongnuo YN568EX TTL
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Nikon D810

Posted 05 April 2015 - 02:54 AM

I have investigated a few lenses that seem to work on my em10

 

The most expensive is a little out of my league, but any thoughts on the others much appreciated.

 

Olympus 40-150mm f/2.8 Pro Lens  $1,499.00

 

Olympus 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Zuiko ED Zoom  $399

Olympus M.Zuiko digital ed 75-300mm II f4.8-6.7.   $549

Panasonic 100-300mm f4-5.6  $597

 

Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 14-150mm F4.0-5.6 II
 



#6 Eric Viele

Eric Viele

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
  • Lenses:Olympus 12-40 f:2.8 Pro
    Olympus 40-150 f:2.8 Pro
    Olympus 60mm f:2.8 Macro
  • Flashes:Olympus FL-600R
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Olympus OM-D E-M10

Posted 03 June 2015 - 07:58 AM

I also have an E-M10. I recently purchased the 75-300 4.8-6.7 and I loved the reach of the lens - it was addictive to be able to zoom in on anything. The size and weight was amazing as well - truly portable. And now the negatives. Image quality was sub-par. I felt like very few of my photos were keepers. Critical testing found the lens only acceptably sharp at 75mm, so back it went to Amazon after 23 days.

That experience made me decide to pull the trigger on the 40-150 f:2.8 Pro. Yes it's big and heavy and very expensive, but it also became my favorite lens after about 5 minutes of use. It's incredibly sharp and hand-holdable at very slow shutter speeds. 1/20 sec at 150mm? No problem! The IS in the E-M10 works incredibly well with this lens.

I can't recommend this lens enough!
  • Billy and Cecily like this

#7 Guest_Ken Sternberg_*

Guest_Ken Sternberg_*
  • Guests

Posted 18 November 2015 - 09:22 AM

Are there any Panasonic or third party lenses with good IQ?

#8 Guest_Guest_*

Guest_Guest_*
  • Guests

Posted 20 November 2015 - 08:51 AM

How's that Panny 100-300mm?

#9 RAH1861

RAH1861

    <3 SDP

  • Stunners
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 570 posts
  • LocationHampton, NH
  • Lenses:Sigma 17-50mm f2.8; Canon 60mm macro; Canon 400mm f5.6L; Canon 10-18mm; Canon 24mm pancake; Canon 55-250; Tamron 70-300; Sigma 18-250; Samyang Fisheye; Samyang 16mm; Samyang 35mm; Tokina 12-24mm
  • Flashes:YongNuo YN-468 II
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Canon 80D; Canon 60D; Canon SL1; Olympus E-M10; Panasonic GM5; Panasonic Lumix LX5

Posted 25 November 2015 - 01:01 PM

There is the Panasonic 35-100 f2.8 (equivalent to a classic 70-200). Costs about $1000.

 

Of course, there is also the Olympus 40-150 f4-5.6 for a lot less money than has been discussed. It's not great, but it's not bad either, and a good deal for the money.


Rich




Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users