Jump to content


Sigma 17-50Mm F2.8 Os?

  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 Sarah Hochgeschurz

Sarah Hochgeschurz

    New Member

  • Stunners
  • Pip
  • 6 posts
  • Lenses:Tamron 70-300mm vc
    Sigma 105mm f2,8
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Nikon D300

Posted 22 February 2015 - 02:24 AM

Is anyone using the Sigma 17-50mm 2.8 for underwater photography ? would like to hear some opinions about it :)

#2 RAH1861


    <3 SDP

  • Stunners
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 579 posts
  • LocationHampton, NH
  • Lenses:Sigma 17-50mm f2.8; Canon 60mm macro; Canon 400mm f5.6L; Canon 10-18mm; Canon 24mm pancake; Canon 55-250; Tamron 70-300; Sigma 18-250; Samyang Fisheye; Samyang 16mm; Samyang 35mm; Tokina 12-24mm
  • Flashes:YongNuo YN-468 II
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Canon 80D; Canon 60D; Canon SL1; Olympus E-M10; Panasonic GM5; Panasonic Lumix LX5

Posted 22 February 2015 - 08:58 AM

I don't use it for underwater, but I do have it and like it very much. I bought it as a replacement for a Sigma 17-70 (the first version), which I never liked because it seemed soft (even softer than a Canon 18-55 kit lens at wide focal lengths, IMHO).


Christopher Frost has a good review of the 17-50, and also talks about it in his review of 4 "general purpose" lenses, and another video of best budget lenses. The review of it by itself is here:



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users