Jump to content


Photo

Wedding Photo Practice


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Mark Scott Sr.

Mark Scott Sr.

    New Member

  • Stunners
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
  • LocationRichmond ,Virginia
  • Lenses:Pentax DA 18-55MM,Quantaray 70-300mm for Pentax k100d
    Nikon DX VR 18-140mm
  • Flashes:Vivitar SMS 30D
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Pentax K100D
    Nikon D5300

Posted 11 October 2014 - 09:34 AM

These are two photos taken at two different weddings. Both are members of my family and graciously allowed me to take some photos.

 The first photo was taken in Oct 2006 .The bride Tina was captured as she was arriving . At the time I was using a Fuji Finepix s3100 ,F-stop 3,exposure set @1/640 and ISO -64.

Second photo is from Jamie and Nicole taken June 2010 at the beach. I now had moved up to a little better camera, Pentax K100D ,F-stop 13,exposure set @1/750 and ISO-800

 These are just a couple pics I really liked.

 

 

Attached Files



#2 David Pavlich

David Pavlich

    Mr Astrophotography!

  • Stunners
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,388 posts
  • LocationWinnipeg, MB, Canada
  • Lenses:Canon 70-200 f2.8 II, Canon 16-35 f4L IS, Tamron 35mm f1.8, Sigma 100-400 f5/6.3
  • Flashes:Yongnuo 560, 565 and 568.
  • Camera Body or Bodies:5D MkIII,

Posted 11 October 2014 - 04:40 PM

Since the first image is a moment of opportunity, it's difficult to set the scene for composition.  The second photo, the first thing would be to check the background.  The water and sky work, but the boat and the people in the water are distracting.  Also, since you're shooting with a bright Sun, either a fill flash or a reflector in front of the bride to reduce the shadows would have been a big help. Her expression is terrific!

 

David


'When one engine fails on a twin-engine airplane, you always have enough power left to get you to the scene of the crash.'

 


#3 QiB1400

QiB1400

    Geek

  • Stunners
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 149 posts
  • LocationBurlington, Canada
  • Lenses:Sony E PZ 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OSS
    Tamron 70-200mm F2.8 Di VC USD
    Canon EF-S 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 IS STM
    Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II
    Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM
    Sigma AF 55-200mm f/4-5.6 DC
  • Flashes:Canon Speedlite 430EX II
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Sony ILCE-5100
    Canon EOS 70D
    Canon EOS 350D
    Canon IXUS 115 HS

Posted 12 October 2014 - 11:52 AM

Hey Mark,

 

The are good shots, however I would reconsider my settings if I were you. On the second photo there is no need to be up to 800 ISO and introduce all that noise. Since it is a portrait kind of shot you could have dropped you aperture by several stops, also you shutter speed can easily be cut down by a factor of two or maybe even three. That should deb enough to get you down to ISO 100, maybe get some background blur and still prevent motion blur.

 

Keep up the good work, but think about those settings when you are shooting.

 

cheers,

 

Maarten



#4 cuda

cuda

    Esteemed Community Contributor

  • Stunners
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,665 posts
  • LocationPlainfield,IL
  • Lenses:Canon 70-200 f2.8 L IS Series II
    Canon 11-24 f4.0 L
    Canon 16-35 f2.8 L Series II
    Canon 50 f1.4
    Canon 24-70 f2.8 L Series II
    Canon 100-400 f4.5/5.6 L Series II
    Canon 1.4 T/C Series III
    Canon 2X T/C Series III
    Canon 100mm f2.8 L Macro
    Canon 17mm f4.0 L Tilt and Shift
    Canon 35mm f1.4 L Series II
  • Flashes:Canon 600 EX-RT x4
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Canon 5DSR
    Canon 5D Mark IV
    Canon 1DX Mark II

Posted 12 October 2014 - 04:20 PM

 Mark they are very nice. The second photo I agree the ISO should probably been around 100, the aperture could have been around f 8.0. In the future maybe watch the background that boat is a distraction of a very nice bridal shot, or just be ready to photoshop it out. The first one maybe change your angle slightly and give the bride some room for travel, also have a flash ready to lighten the shadows. Overall very nice work.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users