Jump to content


Interesting Comment From Sp

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 John W

John W

    Master Photographer

  • Stunners
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,164 posts
  • LocationMaryland - Eastern Shore
  • Lenses:Nikon 200-500 5.6
    Nikon 16-80 2.8-4
    Nikon 500mm f4E FL
    Nikon 50mm f1.8
    Nikon 1.4III extender
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Nikon D500
    Vangurad Actus Plus 283AT Tripod
    Feisol CT-3371 Rapid tripod
    Induro Git 404L series tripod
    Gitzo GM 4552L Monopod
    Really Right Stuff BH-55 Ball Head
    Wimberley WH-200
    Mongoose 3.6 Gimbal
    Induro GHB - 1 Gimbal

Posted 14 October 2017 - 12:31 PM

I think this is an interesting comment from one of my favorite wildlife photographers. I have been following his Back Country website hoping for a review of the D850. This is one of the last exchanges on his D850 blog:


Not sure about choosing this as a wildlife camera over the D500. If you want a do-it-all camera, then sure, but as a wildlife only camera? The big problem most of us have is that we’re focal-length limited. If you can always fill the FX frame, then great, but I know that I typically have to crop my DX shots from my 200-500mm lens. I’d be kidding myself if I thought I wouldn’t have to crop the D850 even more. When viewing 850 images at 1:1, they actually appear slightly noisier than the D500. No problem, right? We can just downsize that huge, 45 MP image. Well, again, if we have to crop a lot, the downsizing advantage disappears. I’ve seen a D850 DX crop and compared it to a 21 MP D500 shot, and the D500 shot actually looked cleaner.

So, if one is going to be cropping to DX size the majority of the time, I really think the D500 is the smarter choice. IQ will be about the same, and the D500 is smaller, lighter, shoots faster and is much less money. Just my two cents. Thanks for all your vids and reviews!

Steve PerryOctober 13, 2017 at 12:16 am #

I agree and I will be putting similar sentiments in my upcoming review. The D850 is a fantastic camera, but not if you’re going to crop to DX all the time. If that’s the case, save soem money and get a D500 (which has better overall performance anyway).





#2 elcab18


    Master Photographer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,013 posts
  • LocationSo Cal
  • Lenses:Nikon 12-24
    Nikon 16-35
    Nikon 50
    Nikon 24-85
    Nikon 70-200
    Nikon 105 micro
    Nikon 200-500 f 5.6
  • Flashes:Yongnuo YN 568 EX
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Nikon D610
    Nikon D500

Posted 14 October 2017 - 02:00 PM

Steve Perry is amazing, always checking in to his site!

Thanks for posting John

#3 rdb images

rdb images

    Super Geek

  • Stunners
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 235 posts
  • LocationWarminster, PA USA
  • Lenses:AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR
    AF-S VR Micro-NIKKOR 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED
  • Flashes:None, but getting one soon.
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Nikon D7100

Posted 14 October 2017 - 04:49 PM

I too really like Steve Perry's website and his work (both photos and educational material.) This analysis is very interesting given the tremendous amount of press we see about the D850 being the best thing since sliced bread. While it is no doubt a tremendous camera, we are reminded that no one camera does everything well.



2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users