Hello all! I currently have the Sigma 24-105 F4 on my D810 as a walk around setup. A buddy just landed the new Tamron 24-70 2.8 and loves it.
My question may seemingly have an obvious answer, but the debate amongst a few folks I know is interesting. Should I get the Tamron or would it be completely redundant? The Tamron is ok at 2.8 and nicely crisp at f4 which is the Sigma's lowest. The Sigma is pretty great all over. Is that stop difference going to manifest itself in my photos of events, candid, impromptu portraits etc? To me it seems that I would simply be paying to lose 35mm.
What am I missing?