Jump to content


Photo

Successful Switch From Tamron 150-600 To Canon 100-400 Ii


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Jensak

Jensak

    Advanced Member

  • Stunners
  • PipPipPip
  • 41 posts
  • Lenses:Canon EF 24-105/4L IS USM, Canon 100-400 IS II, Olympus FCON-T01, Olympus TCON-T01, Tamron SP 15-30/2,8 Di VC USD
  • Flashes:Nissin Di866 MkII
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Canon EOS 5D MkII, Canon EOS 7D MkII, Olympus TG-2, Olympus TG-4, Canon Powershot A590 IS, Voigtländer Vitomatic 1a, Kodac Instamatic 233, Agfa Color - Apotar Paratic, Pentax MX

Posted 30 May 2017 - 01:20 PM

Hi,

 

I recently sold my Tamron 150-600 G1. I had looked into updating it with the G2 but finding any reviews that actually straight out said that it was better at 600mm than the previous generation was nearly impossible. So dishing out the money for something that turns out not to be better in the quality department than the predecessor seemed pointless. I don't need a fancier lens for that money, I need more sharpness.

 

So after a lot of research I decided to skip Tamron altogether and to go with the Canon 100-400 mkII. I don't regret it one bit, despite the hefty price tag. I have the 7d mkII body and got the 1.4 canon extender with the lens.

 

I upgraded my firmware and added the lens profile and the profile with the extender. The results are beyond anything I could have ever gotten with the old Tamron. I've photographed a lot of BIF with the Tamron, and usually at the most 1 of 30 pictures were really sharp or just sharp enough to be acceptable. In comparison, I took the Canon for a walk, I had the extender on, and suddenly saw swans flying by about 30m away. I wasn't ready and hadn't double checked my settings, but I took a high speed set of pictures with it, using the centre focus point and from 30 pictures ONE was UNSHARP. The rest completely smashed any previous Tamron results, even with the extender!

 

So anyone thinking about getting a big tele lens for one of the higher tier Canon cameras (those which still can focus at f8), you will not get disappointed with the Canon 100-400, despite the slightly shorter reach!

 

 


  • David Pavlich likes this

#2 grimlock361

grimlock361

    <3 SDP

  • Stunners
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 852 posts
  • LocationLafayette, LA
  • Lenses:Canon EFS 55-250 f/4-5.6
    Canon EFS 18-135 f/3.5-5.6
    Canon EFS 10-18 f/4.5–5.6
    Canon EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L II
    Canon EF 70-300 f/4-5.6
    Canon EF 28-135 f/3.5-5.6
    Canon EF 50 f/1.8
    Canon EF 100 f/2.8L
    Canon EF 1.4X III Extender
    Sigma 150-600 f/5-6.3 C
  • Flashes:Speedlite 430ex II
    Speedlite 270ex II
  • Camera Body or Bodies:Canon EOS 7DM2
    Canon EOS 80D
    Canon EOS Rebel SL1
    Canon Powershot SX50HS
    Canon Powershot G15
    Canon EOS Elan 7NE (film)
    Canon EOS Rebel T2 (film)

Posted 31 May 2017 - 03:01 PM

Yes.  Its only about the best BIF lens ever!  Most sharp lens in its class.  If you ever want to see and compare lenses check out http://www.the-digital-picture.com/ .   This guy does all the work with REAL test images.  You can compare almost any lens on canon and Nikon systems.  When you see for yourself with your own eyes it kind of takes the air out of DXO mark who only gives a rating without images or testing methodology and that rating always seems to favor one brand........mmmm......strange? 


Portfolio:  http://361photo.net


#3 Red man

Red man

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 24 posts
  • Lenses:Canon 100-400
  • Camera Body or Bodies:EOS 1DX MK II

Posted 22 June 2017 - 04:06 AM

I've been telling people about this lens for years now, it is a stunner.

I have a friend with another third party lens a 150-600 mm sport and he finds he gets better results from a Canon 400mm f.4.5 plus a 1.4 TC says it all IMO.

Chimpy




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users